Extrusion Technology Gains ITAR Certification

Posted on February 25th, 2010 by Mark Casey

Baselodge Group represents Extrusion Technology (X-Tech) and their line of aluminum extruded enclosures, faceplates, and bezels in Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Louisiana.

X-Tech recently achieved ITAR certification, which demonstrates their strong commitment to the needs of their defense and security customers. The X-Tech press release with details of their compliance can be found here.

For more on ITAR and related topics, check out my article on Artful Sourcing.

Outsourcing or Offshoring?

Posted on February 1st, 2010 by Mark Casey

This article is cross-posted on the Artful Sourcing blog: http://artfulsourcing.com/2010/02/01/outsourcing-or-offshoring/

I recently read an article that incorrectly defined outsourcing as offshoring. It might be helpful to some readers to review these terms and their proper application.

Outsourcing is the use of resources outside of one’s own organization to accomplish a business need. These resources could be individuals or businesses, and they may be located in your country or around the world.

Offshoring is the use of resources in a different country. These resources may be part of your organization or they may be a separate organization. Offshoring is typically chosen to take advantage of lower labor rates and/or specific and unique regional capability.

Let’s use some examples.

Example 1: You are the CEO of YourCo Inc. YourCo needs to manufacture your new product, the Widget2010. The challenge you face is that you do not own a factory. Your engineering group has designed the Widget2010, but you have to outsource the manufacturing of the product to someone who specializes in manufacturing. You have many choices as to the size and capability of the manufacturer you choose. Regardless of where the manufacturer is located, you have made the decision to outsource. If the manufacturer is in a different country, you have chosen to offshore. If the manufacturer is located in your own country, you have not chosen to go offshore.  Again, in either case, you are outsourcing.

Example 2: Again, you are the CEO of YourCo Inc. YourCo needs to manufacture your new product, the Widget2010. Your factory in your own country cannot add the product to their mix because they are running at capacity. YourCo has another factory, however, in another country. When the decision is made to manufacture the product in that non-domestic factory, it may be said that the product has been offshored, but not outsourced.

Offshoring is still very controversial because many believe it is the shipping of jobs “overseas.” Outsourcing is not as controversial because very few companies still try to be fully vertically integrated doing everything in-house. Therefore, most companies look to outside suppliers and manufacturers to complete their supply chain. This is the reason that outsourcing (literally, sourcing outside our organization) is widely accepted as smart business practice.

One myth that needs to be exploded for those considering either outsourcing or offshoring is that you will need little or no business structure to manage your outsourced or offshored resources. The truth is that you will still need purchasing experts, program managers, and quality control personnel to effectively manage your offshore and/or outsourced resources.

xTCA Front-Panel Innovation

Posted on September 3rd, 2009 by Mark Casey

Extrusion Technology (X-Tech) out of Randolph, MA has released a video providing an overview of their innovation in xTCA products.

Steve Richardson and Matt Travers discuss how this has been applied to their AdvancedTCA, AMC, MicroTCA, and Ruggedized MicroTCA products.

The link to the video is here.

Sharing Large Files with YouSendIt

Posted on August 10th, 2009 by Mark Casey

This article has been cross-posted in the Artful Sourcing blog.

Thanks to John over at Fedcor Global, I have become a satisfied user of YouSendIt.com, a service that makes sharing large files a snap. Those of us in the manufacturing and sourcing industry have frequent needs to send and receive large files. For years I have used file transfer protocol (ftp) to upload and download large files. While ftp will remain a weapon in my arsenal, I now find YouSendIt to be much easier.

There are paid subscriptions available that will make sense for some users, but so far the free account with the 1 GB limit has worked for me. I simply zip up the files I need to send into one zip file and use the interface to send it to my recipient. The interface is very much like Outlook or any other email client. When I have successfully sent the file, my recipient recieves an email with a link that automatically downloads my file to their computer. It is elegantly simple.

I will be eager to hear of other solutions to sending and receiving large files. Do you have something that works for you?

My First 1,095 Days in Office

Posted on May 4th, 2009 by Mark Casey

President Obama’s first 100 days in office were commemorated and scrutinized last week, as is customary in the US. Last Friday, May 1, 2009, Baselodge Group celebrated the completion of our third year in business. That is 1,095 days, but who’s counting?

As all businesses must do, we have planned for the future, adapted as we have encountered challenges, and looked back to learn from our mistakes.

So, in the spirit of commemorating this milestone, we ask three questions.

What have we done wrong?

As manufacturers’ representatives, we are only as good as the suppliers we represent. Our function is to have a strong working knowledge of our suppliers’ capabilities and to find customers in need of those capabilities. When we match up our customers with our suppliers, we have done our job.

The biggest mistake we made early in our growth was to select a couple of suppliers that were not the right fit for us. I will refrain from saying they were bad suppliers and just stick with they were not right for us. Because we live and work in a specific geographic territory, it is vital that we maintain our reputation as a company that does what it says. In other words, we must be trustworthy. When we signed on to be the sales representatives of a couple of firms whose capabilities were not as great as their brochures depicted and whose cost structures did not allow our customers to meet their goals, we had to make changes. We made those changes…promptly.

What have we done right?

For the most part we have selected very good suppliers with strong capabilities and with institutional commitments to do right by their customers. Three shining examples of this to me are South Bay Circuits for electronics manufacturing, Fedcor Global for user input devices and many other services, and Extrusion Technology (X-Tech) for aluminum extrusion and mechanical systems. Each of these three suppliers has strong technical people in place to support our customers, well run factory operations, and customer support people who understand what it takes to win and keep business.

All of our other suppliers are also excellent manufacturers that add value to our customers. Again, as a manufacturers’ rep firm, we are only as good as our suppliers. Our suppliers are good.

Where are we going?

In keeping with what we have done right and wrong, our future depends on our continuing to offer an ever increasing complementary lineup of custom manufacturers. We frequently field calls from suppliers interested in representation in Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, and New Mexico. We treat each call seriously and make a determination about whether that firm’s services fill some missing niche in what we currently offer to our customers.

When business conditions allow us to expand, we plan to add additional outside salespeople to take the message of our suppliers into the broader marketplace.

Also, we continue to lay the foundation for growing our presence in the contract pharmaceutical manufacturing, nutraceutical manufacturing, and biotech manufacturing markets. Dr. Sam Lockwood is developing our corporate strategy on these fronts.

Conclusion

As we commemorate these three years since we first hung our shingle, we continue to focus on fulfilling our promises. That is what it is really all about. Our customers are our most precious resource. This is the reason we have associated with excellent suppliers and continue to build a strong line card. By so doing we become a valuable part of our customers’ supply chains. As we recurrently fulfill our promises, we engender trust in our customers. When that happens, our customers, our suppliers, and Baselodge Group all thrive.

Thank you to all of our clients and suppliers for making these first three years exciting and fulfilling. We look forward to many more years of service.

Sheffield on Embedded Systems

Posted on February 20th, 2009 by Mark Casey

My friend Jimmy Sheffield has written an excellent article on embedded systems on the Artful Sourcing blog.

You can find the article at this link.

Jimmy is founder of Level 3 Systems and is an authority on embedded systems and electronics development in general. Without reservation I recommend Jimmy and Level 3 Systems for contract design and development work. You can also find Jimmy’s bio on the Our Authors section of Artful Sourcing.

The Joy of the Factory

Posted on February 12th, 2009 by Mark Casey

This article is cross-posted in Artful Sourcing.

Disclaimer: I am well aware of the historical and current conditions in some factories and that many factories have been and are places of injustice for workers. The impressions I share in this article are not intended to deny such problems or minimize them. The types of factories I am describing here are the ones run by the kinds of firms Baselodge Group represents and those I have personally toured.

I still remember the first time I stepped into a factory and went on a tour. While the workers who were “cranking widgets” may not have agreed, I thought it was the coolest workplace I had ever seen. My first factory visit was actually at a plastics injection molding facility. I visited on a cold winter day that seemed to accentuate the energy and warmth of the factory. The bright lighting and hum of molding presses dropping out newly formed parts testified that something important was happening.

Depending on your definition of a factory, I actually had already been in one many years before. My second job out of high school was working for a polyethylene facility in the Houston area. This was a large plant producing the plastic granules and pellets that were used in injection molding factories just like this “first” one I visited many years later. Having worked in a polyethylene plant, there was a nice completion to visiting the injection molding facility and seeing those pellets being vacuum filled into the top of the molding presses and then feeding into the augers for melting and injecting into the injection tools.

Since that first visit to the injection molding facility, I have had the privilege of being in many factories. I have toured printed circuit board factories where bare boards were produced. My office for a time was basically in the IBM Austin board house which was purchased by Multek. I have also been in many circuit board assembly factories both in the the US and Mexico. Many of these factories also do complete product builds. I have also had the privilege of touring a die casting factory and a very high end medical equipment facility where the products being manufactured were around $500,000 each. One of the most interesting facilities for me was a pharmaceutical factory that I visited along with our VP Dr. Sam Lockwood.

So what is it about “the factory” that impresses me so much? Why is there what I call the joy of the factory?

Organization

Some factories are better organized than others, but every factory has to have some level of organization in order to produce goods. When I tour a new factory, I always enjoy listening to the managers and employees discuss the layout of the machines, the number and type of shifts, and the changes that have recently occurred. The opposite of organization is chaos. Chaos inhibits productivity while organization enables productivity.

Industry

What I mean by this is that factories are places where humans are industrious, and I usually come away energized myself. Now, I have been in factories where there was not enough work, where the machines were idle, and the people were scarce. There was little noise and little industry. Those types of factories are sad because the artifacts of better times are everywhere, but the lack of activity reveals that things have gone wrong. Active working factories, though, are encouraging and exciting.

Documentation

Facilities that are ISO certified (or that hold other certifications) have to be very meticulous about their documentation and their processes. Many factories have automated extensively while others are still primarily using paper, file cabinets, and white boards. Documentation is vital not only to producing quality products but also to tracking problems and resolving quality issues.

Technology

As with documentation, some factories are more technologically advanced than others. I always enjoy watching the technology in action. Whether it is a high speed drill system drilling thousands of holes per minute in circuit boards or robotics in a plastics plant, the technology employed can give a factory an edge and really improve productivity.

The Dignity of Work

This is a bit philosophical, but there is a certain dignity that I find in the factory. Most people agree there can be dignity in any kind of work. In the factory I see men and women contributing to the production of something tangible that has a use in the world. I have been in factories that manufacture plastics and electronics for toys. It is true that those toys will make money for the factory that produces them, the distributor that moves them, and the retailer that sells them. Those are all good things, but the toys produced sell because they are wanted. They are wanted because they have the ability to make children happy and possibly to help in their development. The same thing can be said about most products that are produced in the factory — they have a purpose. The lowest paid line worker has a hand in producing these valuable products, and there is dignity in that.

In his book Maverick, Ricardo Semler retells an old business parable:

“Three stone cutters were asked about their jobs. The first said he was paid to cut stones. The second replied that he used special techniques to shape stones in an exceptional way, and proceeded to demonstrate his skills. The third stone cutter just smiled and said: ‘I build cathedrals.’”

Some people in factories are just going through the motions I suspect, but I get the sense that most of them find dignity in building cathedrals.

Teamwork

No finished product is created from raw materials without a lot of teamwork. Much of the teamwork is outside of the factory itself. It includes the electric power plant, the water treatment facility, and other utilities that are contracted for by the factory. It also involves the truckers who transport raw materials to the factory and the suppliers that make up the supply chain of equipment and raw materials. The financiers, investors, and entrepreneurs who provide the working capital are critical. The janitors, the managers, the engineers, the machinists, the carpenters, the operators, and everyone else that works in the factory is part of a large team working together to make something happen.

Conclusion

When I visit the factory, I am usually with a prospective customer that is considering contracting with that factory to have their product contract manufactured. As I walk the factory with the prospective client, the plant manager, and engineers, I often wonder what the line workers think about us and what they think we think about them. I am not sure what they think about me/us, but I view their work with the understanding that I am part of their team. If it were not for them doing what they do and offering a valuable service to the customer, I would have nothing to sell. I admire the work they do and am grateful to be able to win business for them to help them continue doing their part for the team.

I am a fan of the factory, and it is my hope that in the years ahead our factories will grow and prosper as they produce the goods required by our economy. As that happens, more and more people will be able to find dignified work that will allow them to take care of their families and buy the goods and services that everyone else produces for them.

Outsourcing in 2009

Posted on January 22nd, 2009 by Mark Casey

With the New Year and a new administration underway, I wonder what 2009 will mean for our overall economy and for outsourcing in particular? When we launched Baselodge Group in 2006 to serve customers in Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, and New Mexico, we decided to focus on being “outsourcing specialists.” We knew that the word “outsourcing” was somewhat charged, but we chose it on purpose because that is our focus.

As time goes along more and more people understand the rationale behind outsourcing services that are not really their core competency. As long as there have been external supply chains, there has been outsourcing. In our case we provide the outsourcing of a variety of manufacturing services from printed circuit boards (PCBA) and final assemblies to injection molding, custom keypads, membrane switches, metal casting, and aluminum extrusions.

As long as our customers need to manufacture some or all of their products outside of their own facilities, there will be a need for the services we offer. Some of our customers outsource only during the engineering phase when they need quick-turn circuit boards or plastics. Others need us only when they are ready to move into volume production of their products.

So, what will the year ahead look like for outsourcing? Some experts believe the market will experience flat to slight growth. EDN has a good article on the topic. We will continue to assist our customers with their new and existing products as they look to sustain and grow their business in these uncertain times.

We hope 2009 is great for all of our customers and suppliers. Please let us know if we can help you with any of your outsourcing needs.

Moving Beyond My Planner to GTD

Posted on January 8th, 2009 by Mark Casey

Cross-posted in Artful Sourcing.

I have been as devoted a user of the Franklin-Covey planner system as anyone could have been since 1996. It has been a loyal companion of mine for over twelve years now. In fact, my term of endearment for my planner is “my brain.” When I dropped it few days ago I exclaimed, “Oh no, I dropped my brain!”

As technology has progressed, so have the inputs of information into my work life and personal life. As I wrote a couple of weeks ago, my Outlook inbox had gotten out of control and had become a metaphor for the barrage of information that I was not handling efficiently. Thanks to Merlin Mann at 43folders.com, I got on the right track with the inbox zero approach. I am happy to report that I continue to process email, and I am maintaining a zero inbox. It feels good.

The next step for me was to read David Allen’s book Getting Things Done. The system he describes in the book is a workflow system that has developed a cult-like following. Its practitioners refer to it simply as GTD. A quick web search of that acronym will tell you all you need to know about how the system has caught on. Merlin’s inbox zero approach grew out of GTD.

I recently finished David’s book and implemented the system. It feels really good and makes sense to me. The biggest dilemma I faced in implementing GTD was how to use all of my current tools in an efficient way. David is clear that the GTD system can be implemented in a variety of ways. Some people use only paper. Others use only digital tools. Others use some combination of the two. In my case I had the following tools:

1. Franklin-Covey Planner

2. iPhone 3G

3. Microsoft Outlook on laptop PC

4. Act! (salesforce automation)

5. X-Mind (open-source mindmapping software)

I was really happy to read in the book that David is a proponent of mindmapping and that he is a user of Act!, the sales force database that I use. This validated that there is a way to use these tools in the GTD system. I also knew from Merlin’s stuff that Outlook works well in GTD. My iPhone already synchronized with Outlook for calendar and contacts. It did not, however, sychronize Outlook tasks.

A few years ago I got to know a great company in Indianapolis called Escient. They have one of the best slogans I had ever heard: “We make technology behave.” What I needed was a way to make all of these tools behave and work together. After some research and experimentation, I have a good solution that works for me. Unfortunatley, it appears as though the paper planner is about to be replaced. That makes me a little sad. The only role left for the planner in my workflow system would be as a notebook in which to take notes at meetings and on calls. I don’t need a robust planner for that. A simple journal will do for that purpose.

I purchased two very nice iPhone applications to allow me to sychronize both my task list (or Next Actions in GTD parlance) and my mindmaps. I realize that my particular implementation of GTD is constrained by my toolset. If you do not have an iPhone you will have to find the proper tools for your equipment and system. If there are any iPhone users out there that would like to know my specific implementation, I will be glad to share it. Drop me a line at mcasey@baselodge.com.

The bottom line is that because of GTD I am already experiencing a rise in productivity and a decrease in stress. Those two facts alone make this system worth sharing.

Is Inbox Zero Real?

Posted on December 23rd, 2008 by Mark Casey

It’s the night before the night before Christmas. New Year’s resolutions are starting to dance in my head. This time of year always allows me to review the year that is coming to a close and to look for ways to improve the way I work. A few days ago my wife’s cousin, Chris, recommended that I consider going to an “inbox zero” approach to email. I have already implemented some version of this concept. Here is the excellent Merlin Mann (of 43folders.com) video he pointed me to as a way to get started:

The first thing I did to implement Merlin’s approach was to create a .DMZ folder in Outlook. I then moved all of my huge backlog of emails from the inbox into that folder. Just like that I was at a zero inbox. Staying there requires that I stop just “checking” email and start “processing” email, as Merlin explains. I am also going to be using Outlook’s Task features a lot more in the new year.

As Merlin states many times, this approach to email is an outgrowth of the Getting Things Done book by David Allen. That book is on the top of my “to read” list for the new year.

Merlin Mann’s website on this topic is www.43folders.com/izero

The more I learn about Merlin Mann, the more I am impressed.

I wish all of our readers, customers, suppliers, and friends happy holidays and a prosperous 2009!